Skip to content
Effective

Concealed Carry in Rhode Island:
The Dual-Track System

BruenLCCWConcealed Carry

Rhode Island operates one of the most unusual concealed carry permitting systems in the United States. Two entirely separate statutory provisions authorize two different government bodies to issue licenses to carry a concealed weapon (LCCW), each with its own legal standard, application process, and scope of authorization.[1][2]

Track 1: Local Authority (Shall-Issue)

Under RIGL 11-47-11, city and town licensing authorities (typically the police chief) shall issue an LCCW to qualified applicants who are "suitable persons." The statute uses mandatory language: the licensing authority "shall issue" the permit upon satisfaction of the statutory requirements. This track requires the applicant to be 21 years of age or older, to reside or maintain a place of business in the issuing municipality (or reside in the United States and hold a valid CCW from another state), and to complete a firearms qualification course scoring at least 195 out of 300.[1] In Gadomski v. Tavares (2015), the Rhode Island Supreme Court enforced the statutory shall-issue standard by overturning an unjustified permit denial. The court held that a "showing of need" is not a component of 11-47-11, and found the chief's stated reasons for denial were either insufficient or incorrect under the statute.[3]

Track 2: Attorney General (May-Issue)

Under RIGL 11-47-18, the Attorney General may issue a permit upon a "proper showing of need." Unlike the local track, this is discretionary. The AG has historically interpreted the need requirement strictly, generally requiring a specific documented threat, a work-related purpose such as private security, or retired law enforcement status. The AG permit is also the only permit that authorizes open carry in Rhode Island. Non-residents who do not hold a valid out-of-state CCW may apply through this track.[2]

Post-Bruen Implications

The Supreme Court's decision in NYSRPA v. Bruen (2022) struck down New York's "proper cause" requirement for concealed carry permits, raising questions about any system that conditions a permit on a showing of need. In response, Attorney General Neronha issued guidance (AG 2022-01) arguing that because Rhode Islanders have access to the shall-issue local track under 11-47-11, the AG's discretionary may-issue track under 11-47-18 remains constitutional. In August 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island upheld this position in O'Neil v. Neronha[5]. Judge William E. Smith granted summary judgment for the state, finding that Bruen does not require states to permit open carry specifically and that the manner of public carry may be regulated so long as one lawful method of carrying remains available. The plaintiffs have appealed to the First Circuit Court of Appeals, and the case remains pending. The local shall-issue track under 11-47-11 was already Bruen-compliant, as it does not require a showing of special need.[4]

Practical Differences

The two tracks produce permits with different scopes. A local LCCW under 11-47-11 authorizes concealed carry only. An AG permit under 11-47-18 authorizes both concealed and open carry. Both permits are valid statewide, carry a $40 fee, and are valid for four years. The qualification requirement (195 out of 300 on an Army "L" target at 25 yards) applies to both tracks. Despite these shared elements, the dual-track structure creates confusion for applicants, particularly regarding which authority to approach and what standard applies.